Reference group
If you have any remarks, request, complaints etc. regarding this course, contact the lecturer and/or the reference group:
Name | Program | |
---|---|---|
Guro Seternes | MTFYMA | guroseter [at] gmail [dot] com |
Raymond Toft | MTFYMA | raymont [at] stud [dot] ntnu [dot] no |
Silje Irene Hansen | MTFYMA | siljeirene [dot] hansen [at] gmail [dot] com |
Meeting 18.9.:
- The students are for the most part satisfied with the course, lectures and exercises. Systematic lectures, good notes.
- Some consern about high speed during lectures especially in the early weeks, but it seems students appreciate extra details/explainations. The lecturer will work to reduce the speed without sacrificing explainations.
- Some students find scaling particularly difficult.
- Q1: Post slides from lectures? Yes, they will be posted before the exam.
- Q2: What will be lectured next week? See 'Lectures' in left menu.
Meeting 15.10.:
- The students are for the most part satisfied with the course, the lectureing speed is better now.
- A statistics student feel the course is difficult compared to other courses this semester.
Meeting 25.11.:
- Evaluation of whole semester:
- The students liked the course very much.
- Lectures were good, very structured, good notes
- Problems sets were long and that was good (but much longer would not do).
- Availability of lecturer and assistent as expected. A lot of help to be found amongst other students in 'Matteland'.
- Webpage was good and informative - above the average. Updated regularly and many students checked it several times every week.
- The reference group worked out nicely, good cooperation with lecturer. Could and did contact him also outside of the meetings.
- Evaluation of project:
- Main consern of many: Hard to know how much each group should do (one problem or all?)
- Information on this existed on the course webpage, but not on the problem set.
- Improved information was posted on the webpage after some days and a student initiative, this info seems to have been sufficient.
- Want: More detailed info on the problem set on how to work.
- To be taken into account next year!
- Groups:
- "4 out 5" registration works well.
- Write that "it is an advantage to have a member doing numerics"
- Presentations nice and efficient
- single PDF with all presentations and 6 min count-down alarm was very usefull.
- "Not all problems felt equally relevant for the exam"